Publications

What is a Publication?
87 Publications visible to you, out of a total of 87

Abstract (Expand)

Abstract Motivation Simulating Multiple Sequence Alignments (MSAs) using probabilistic models of sequence evolution plays an important role in the evaluation of phylogenetic inference tools, and isluation of phylogenetic inference tools, and is crucial to the development of novel learning-based approaches for phylogenetic reconstruction, for instance, neural networks. These models and the resulting simulated data need to be as realistic as possible to be indicative of the performance of the developed tools on empirical data and to ensure that neural networks trained on simulations perform well on empirical data. Over the years, numerous models of evolution have been published with the goal to represent as faithfully as possible the sequence evolution process and thus simulate empirical-like data. In this study, we simulated DNA and protein MSAs under increasingly complex models of evolution with and without insertion/deletion (indel) events using a state-of-the-art sequence simulator. We assessed their realism by quantifying how accurately supervised learning methods are able to predict whether a given MSA is simulated or empirical. Results Our results show that we can distinguish between empirical and simulated MSAs with high accuracy using two distinct and independently developed classification approaches across all tested models of sequence evolution. Our findings suggest that the current state-of-the-art models fail to accurately replicate several aspects of empirical MSAs, including site-wise rates as well as amino acid and nucleotide composition. Data and Code Availability All simulated and empirical MSAs, as well as all analysis results, are available at https://cme.h-its.org/exelixis/material/simulation_study.tar.gz . All scripts required to reproduce our results are available at https://github.com/tschuelia/SimulationStudy and https://github.com/JohannaTrost/seqsharp . Contact julia.haag@h-its.org

Authors: Johanna Trost, Julia Haag, Dimitri Höhler, Laurent Jacob, Alexandros Stamatakis, Bastien Boussau

Date Published: 12th Jul 2023

Publication Type: Journal

Abstract

Not specified

Authors: Anastasis Togkousidis, Olga Chernomor, Alexandros Stamatakis

Date Published: 1st May 2023

Publication Type: Proceedings

Abstract (Expand)

Abstract Species tree-aware phylogenetic methods model how gene trees are generated along the species tree by a series of evolutionary events, including the duplication, transfer and loss of genes.fer and loss of genes. Over the past ten years these methods have emerged as a powerful tool for inferring and rooting gene and species trees, inferring ancestral gene repertoires, and studying the processes of gene and genome evolution. However, these methods are complex and can be more difficult to use than traditional phylogenetic approaches. Method development is rapid, and it can be difficult to decide between approaches and interpret results. Here, we review ALE and GeneRax, two popular packages for reconciling gene and species trees, explaining how they work, how results can be interpreted, and providing a tutorial for practical analysis. It was recently suggested that reconciliation-based estimates of duplication and transfer frequencies are unreliable. We evaluate this criticism and find that, provided parameters are estimated from the data rather than being fixed based on prior assumptions, reconciliation-based inferences are in good agreement with the literature, recovering variation in gene duplication and transfer frequencies across lineages consistent with the known biology of studied clades. For example, published datasets support the view that transfers greatly outnumber duplications in most prokaryotic lineages. We conclude by discussing some limitations of current models and prospects for future progress. Significance statement Evolutionary trees provide a framework for understanding the history of life and organising biodiversity. In this review, we discuss some recent progress on statistical methods that allow us to combine information from many different genes within the framework of an overarching phylogenetic species tree. We review the advantages and uses of these methods and discuss case studies where they have been used to resolve deep branches within the tree of life. We conclude with the limitations of current methods and suggest how they might be overcome in the future.

Authors: Tom A. Williams, Adrian A. Davin, Benoit Morel, Lénárd L. Szánthó, Anja Spang, Alexandros Stamatakis, Philip Hugenholtz, Gergely J. Szöllősi

Date Published: 17th Mar 2023

Publication Type: Journal

Abstract

Not specified

Authors: Dilek Koptekin, Eren Yüncü, Ricardo Rodríguez-Varela, N. Ezgi Altınışık, Nikolaos Psonis, Natalia Kashuba, Sevgi Yorulmaz, Robert George, Duygu Deniz Kazancı, Damla Kaptan, Kanat Gürün, Kıvılcım Başak Vural, Hasan Can Gemici, Despoina Vassou, Evangelia Daskalaki, Cansu Karamurat, Vendela K. Lagerholm, Ömür Dilek Erdal, Emrah Kırdök, Aurelio Marangoni, Andreas Schachner, Handan Üstündağ, Ramaz Shengelia, Liana Bitadze, Mikheil Elashvili, Eleni Stravopodi, Mihriban Özbaşaran, Güneş Duru, Argyro Nafplioti, C. Brian Rose, Tuğba Gencer, Gareth Darbyshire, Alexander Gavashelishvili, Konstantine Pitskhelauri, Özlem Çevik, Osman Vuruşkan, Nina Kyparissi-Apostolika, Ali Metin Büyükkarakaya, Umay Oğuzhanoğlu, Sevinç Günel, Eugenia Tabakaki, Akper Aliev, Anar Ibrahimov, Vaqif Shadlinski, Adamantios Sampson, Gülşah Merve Kılınç, Çiğdem Atakuman, Alexandros Stamatakis, Nikos Poulakakis, Yılmaz Selim Erdal, Pavlos Pavlidis, Jan Storå, Füsun Özer, Anders Götherström, Mehmet Somel

Date Published: 2023

Publication Type: Journal

Abstract (Expand)

Abstract Motivation Missing data and incomplete lineage sorting (ILS) are two major obstacles to accurate species tree inference. Gene tree summary methods such as ASTRAL and ASTRID have been developedy methods such as ASTRAL and ASTRID have been developed to account for ILS. However, they can be severely affected by high levels of missing data. Results We present Asteroid, a novel algorithm that infers an unrooted species tree from a set of unrooted gene trees. We show on both empirical and simulated datasets that Asteroid is substantially more accurate than ASTRAL and ASTRID for very high proportions (>80%) of missing data. Asteroid is several orders of magnitude faster than ASTRAL for datasets that contain thousands of genes. It offers advanced features such as parallelization, support value computation and support for multi-copy and multifurcating gene trees. Availability and implementation Asteroid is freely available at https://github.com/BenoitMorel/Asteroid. Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Authors: Benoit Morel, Tom A Williams, Alexandros Stamatakis

Date Published: 2023

Publication Type: Journal

Abstract (Expand)

Abstract Summary Maximum likelihood (ML) is a widely used phylogenetic inference method. ML implementations heavily rely on numerical optimization routines that use internal numerical thresholds totion routines that use internal numerical thresholds to determine convergence. We systematically analyze the impact of these threshold settings on the log-likelihood and runtimes for ML tree inferences with RAxML-NG, IQ-TREE, and FastTree on empirical datasets. We provide empirical evidence that we can substantially accelerate tree inferences with RAxML-NG and IQ-TREE by changing the default values of two such numerical thresholds. At the same time, altering these settings does not significantly impact the quality of the inferred trees. We further show that increasing both thresholds accelerates the RAxML-NG bootstrap without influencing the resulting support values. For RAxML-NG, increasing the likelihood thresholds ϵLnL and ϵbrlen to 10 and 103, respectively, results in an average tree inference speedup of 1.9 ± 0.6 on Data collection 1, 1.8 ± 1.1 on Data collection 2, and 1.9 ± 0.8 on Data collection 2 for the RAxML-NG bootstrap compared to the runtime under the current default setting. Increasing the likelihood threshold ϵLnL to 10 in IQ-TREE results in an average tree inference speedup of 1.3 ± 0.4 on Data collection 1 and 1.3 ± 0.9 on Data collection 2. Availability and implementation All MSAs we used for our analyses, as well as all results, are available for download at https://cme.h-its.org/exelixis/material/freeLunch_data.tar.gz. Our data generation scripts are available at https://github.com/tschuelia/ml-numerical-analysis.

Authors: Julia Haag, Lukas Hübner, Alexey M Kozlov, Alexandros Stamatakis

Date Published: 2023

Publication Type: Journal

Abstract

Not specified

Authors: Nikolaos Psonis, Despoina Vassou, Argyro Nafplioti, Eugenia Tabakaki, Pavlos Pavlidis, Alexandros Stamatakis, Nikos Poulakakis

Date Published: 2023

Publication Type: Journal

Powered by
(v.1.14.2)
Copyright © 2008 - 2023 The University of Manchester and HITS gGmbH