Filter and export

Publications

What is a Publication?
104 Publications visible to you, out of a total of 104
Predicting Phylogenetic Bootstrap Values via Machine Learning

Abstract (Expand)

Estimating the statistical robustness of the inferred tree(s) constitutes an integral part of most phylogenetic analyses. Commonly, one computes and assigns a branch support value to each inner branch … of the inferred phylogeny. The most widely used method for calculating branch support on trees inferred under Maximum Likelihood (ML) is the Standard, non-parametric Felsenstein Bootstrap Support (SBS). Due to the high computational cost of the SBS, a plethora of methods has been developed to approximate it, for instance, via the Rapid Bootstrap (RB) algorithm. There have also been attempts to devise faster, alternative support measures, such as the SH-aLRT (Shimodaira–Hasegawalike approximate Likelihood Ratio Test) or the UltraFast Bootstrap 2 (UFBoot2) method. Those faster alternatives exhibit some limitations, such as the need to assess model violations (UFBoot2) or meaningless low branch support intervals (SH-aLRT). Here, we present the Educated Bootstrap Guesser (EBG), a machine learning-based tool that predicts SBS branch support values for a given input phylogeny. EBG is on average 9.4 (σ = 5.5) times faster than UFBoot2. EBG-based SBS estimates exhibit a median absolute error of 5 when predicting SBS values between 0 and 100. Furthermore, EBG also provides uncertainty measures for all per-branch SBS predictions and thereby allows for a more rigorous and careful interpretation. EBG can predict SBS support values on a phylogeny comprising 1654 SARS-CoV2 genome sequences within 3 hours on a mid-class laptop. EBG is available under GNU GPL3.

Authors: Julius Wiegert, Dimitri Höhler, Julia Haag, Alexandros Stamatakis

Date Published: 6th Mar 2024

Publication Type: Journal

Quantification and Prediction of Multiple Sequence Alignment Difficulty

Abstract

Not specified

Authors: Luc Mercatoris, Alexandros Stamatakis

Date Published: 1st Feb 2024

Publication Type: Master's Thesis

Approximating Phylogenetic Tree Distributions with Distance-Based Methods

Abstract (Expand)

Accurately reconstructing the evolutionary history of a group of organism is a complex task. Current state-of-the-art tools produce phylogenetic tree distributions with Markov chain Monte-Carlo (MCMC) … methods by sampling the posterior tree distribution under a given model to reflect uncertainties in the underlying models and data. While these distributions offer very good insight into the phylogenetic history, they are very compute intensive. In this thesis we present and evaluate multiple heuristics to approximate these distributions with distance-based methods. To judge the quality of our heuristics, we compare our distribution against a reference MCMC-based distribution with split and frequency-based metrics. We show that our method works well for some types of data, but not all, compared to other tools, and that further information about the data needs to be incorporated to make this viable in practice. Our most successful method is characterized by the use of pair-wise distance distributions to apply likelihood-supported perturbation to the input distances for the Neighbor Joining algorithm. Because this ignores the interdependencies between distances, we need to add parsimony filtering as a post-processing step to eliminate unlikely trees from our distributions, which significantly improves the results. Finally, we also discuss the shortcomings and future potential of our heuristics to more accurately estimate pair-wise distances and their interdependencies, which should lead to more competitive results.

Authors: Noah Wahl, Benoit Morel, Alexandros Stamatakis

Date Published: 1st Dec 2023

Publication Type: Master's Thesis

AleRax: A tool for gene and species tree co-estimation and reconciliation under a probabilistic model of gene duplication, transfer, and loss

Abstract (Expand)

ABSTRACT Motivation Genomes are a rich source of information on the pattern and process of evolution across biological scales. How best to make use of that information is an active area of research in …at information is an active area of research in phylogenetics. Ideally, phylogenetic methods should not only model substitutions along gene trees, which explain differences between homologous gene sequences, but also the processes that generate the gene trees themselves along a shared species tree. To conduct accurate inferences, one needs to account for uncertainty at both levels, that is, in gene trees estimated from inherently short sequences and in their diverse evolutionary histories along a shared species tree. Results We present AleRax, a software that can infer reconciled gene trees together with a shared species tree using a simple, yet powerful, probabilistic model of gene duplication, transfer, and loss. A key feature of AleRax is its ability to account for uncertainty in the gene tree and its reconciliation by using an efficient approximation to calculate the joint phylogenetic-reconciliation likelihood and sample reconciled gene trees accordingly. Simulations and analyses of empirical data show that AleRax is one order of magnitude faster than competing gene tree inference tools while attaining the same accuracy. It is consistently more robust than species tree inference methods such as SpeciesRax and ASTRAL-Pro 2 under gene tree uncertainty. Finally, AleRax can process multiple gene families in parallel thereby allowing users to compare competing phylogenetic hypotheses and estimate model parameters, such as DTL probabilities for genome-scale datasets with hundreds of taxa Availability and Implementation GNU GPL at https://github.com/BenoitMorel/AleRax and data are made available at https://cme.h-its.org/exelixis/material/alerax_data.tar.gz . Contact Benoit.Morel@h-its.org Supplementary information Supplementary material is available.

Authors: Benoit Morel, Tom A. Williams, Alexandros Stamatakis, Gergely J. Szöllősi

Date Published: 7th Oct 2023

Publication Type: Journal

Adaptive RAxML-NG: Accelerating Phylogenetic Inference under Maximum Likelihood using Dataset Difficulty

Abstract (Expand)

Abstract Phylogenetic inferences under the maximum likelihood criterion deploy heuristic tree search strategies to explore the vast search space. Depending on the input dataset, searches from different …t, searches from different starting trees might all converge to a single tree topology. Often, though, distinct searches infer multiple topologies with large log-likelihood score differences or yield topologically highly distinct, yet almost equally likely, trees. Recently, Haag et al. introduced an approach to quantify, and implemented machine learning methods to predict, the dataset difficulty with respect to phylogenetic inference. Easy multiple sequence alignments (MSAs) exhibit a single likelihood peak on their likelihood surface, associated with a single tree topology to which most, if not all, independent searches rapidly converge. As difficulty increases, multiple locally optimal likelihood peaks emerge, yet from highly distinct topologies. To make use of this information, we introduce and implement an adaptive tree search heuristic in RAxML-NG, which modifies the thoroughness of the tree search strategy as a function of the predicted difficulty. Our adaptive strategy is based upon three observations. First, on easy datasets, searches converge rapidly and can hence be terminated at an earlier stage. Second, overanalyzing difficult datasets is hopeless, and thus it suffices to quickly infer only one of the numerous almost equally likely topologies to reduce overall execution time. Third, more extensive searches are justified and required on datasets with intermediate difficulty. While the likelihood surface exhibits multiple locally optimal peaks in this case, a small proportion of them is significantly better. Our experimental results for the adaptive heuristic on 9,515 empirical and 5,000 simulated datasets with varying difficulty exhibit substantial speedups, especially on easy and difficult datasets (53% of total MSAs), where we observe average speedups of more than 10×. Further, approximately 94% of the inferred trees using the adaptive strategy are statistically indistinguishable from the trees inferred under the standard strategy (RAxML-NG).

Authors: Anastasis Togkousidis, Oleksiy M Kozlov, Julia Haag, Dimitri Höhler, Alexandros Stamatakis

Date Published: 1st Oct 2023

Publication Type: Journal

Interpreting phylogenetic placements for taxonomic assignment of environmental DNA

Abstract (Expand)

Abstract Taxonomic assignment of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) is an important bioinformatics step in analyzing environmental sequencing data. Pairwise alignment and phylogenetic‐placement methods …ogenetic‐placement methods represent two alternative approaches to taxonomic assignments, but their results can differ. Here we used available colpodean ciliate OTUs from forest soils to compare the taxonomic assignments of VSEARCH (which performs pairwise alignments) and EPA‐ng (which performs phylogenetic placements). We showed that when there are differences in taxonomic assignments between pairwise alignments and phylogenetic placements at the subtaxon level, there is a low pairwise similarity of the OTUs to the reference database. We then showcase how the output of EPA‐ng can be further evaluated using GAPPA to assess the taxonomic assignments when there exist multiple equally likely placements of an OTU, by taking into account the sum over the likelihood weights of the OTU placements within a subtaxon, and the branch distances between equally likely placement locations. We also inferred the evolutionary and ecological characteristics of the colpodean OTUs using their placements within subtaxa. This study demonstrates how to fully analyze the output of EPA‐ng, by using GAPPA in conjunction with knowledge of the taxonomic diversity of the clade of interest.

Authors: Isabelle Ewers, Lubomír Rajter, Lucas Czech, Frédéric Mahé, Alexandros Stamatakis, Micah Dunthorn

Date Published: 1st Sep 2023

Publication Type: Journal

Simulations of sequence evolution: how (un)realistic they are and why

Abstract (Expand)

Abstract Motivation Simulating Multiple Sequence Alignments (MSAs) using probabilistic models of sequence evolution plays an important role in the evaluation of phylogenetic inference tools, and is …luation of phylogenetic inference tools, and is crucial to the development of novel learning-based approaches for phylogenetic reconstruction, for instance, neural networks. These models and the resulting simulated data need to be as realistic as possible to be indicative of the performance of the developed tools on empirical data and to ensure that neural networks trained on simulations perform well on empirical data. Over the years, numerous models of evolution have been published with the goal to represent as faithfully as possible the sequence evolution process and thus simulate empirical-like data. In this study, we simulated DNA and protein MSAs under increasingly complex models of evolution with and without insertion/deletion (indel) events using a state-of-the-art sequence simulator. We assessed their realism by quantifying how accurately supervised learning methods are able to predict whether a given MSA is simulated or empirical. Results Our results show that we can distinguish between empirical and simulated MSAs with high accuracy using two distinct and independently developed classification approaches across all tested models of sequence evolution. Our findings suggest that the current state-of-the-art models fail to accurately replicate several aspects of empirical MSAs, including site-wise rates as well as amino acid and nucleotide composition. Data and Code Availability All simulated and empirical MSAs, as well as all analysis results, are available at https://cme.h-its.org/exelixis/material/simulation_study.tar.gz . All scripts required to reproduce our results are available at https://github.com/tschuelia/SimulationStudy and https://github.com/JohannaTrost/seqsharp . Contact julia.haag@h-its.org

Authors: Johanna Trost, Julia Haag, Dimitri Höhler, Laurent Jacob, Alexandros Stamatakis, Bastien Boussau

Date Published: 12th Jul 2023

Publication Type: Journal

Powered by
 (v.1.16.0)
About HITS Publication SEEK | About HITS-Publication-SEEK | Funding and Programmes | Credits
Copyright © 2008 - 2024 The University of Manchester and HITS gGmbH