Publications

What is a Publication?
1687 Publications visible to you, out of a total of 1687

Abstract

Not specified

Authors: Philip Weidner, Daniel Saar, Michaela Söhn, Torsten Schroeder, Yanxiong Yu, Frank G. Zöllner, Norbert Ponelies, Xiaobo Zhou, André Zwicky, Florian N. Rohrbacher, Vijaya R. Pattabiraman, Matthias Tanriver, Alexander Bauer, Hazem Ahmed, Simon M. Ametamey, Philipp Riffel, Rony Seger, Jeffrey W. Bode, Rebecca C. Wade, Matthias P.A. Ebert, Birthe B. Kragelund, Elke Burgermeister

Date Published: 1st Apr 2024

Publication Type: Journal

Abstract

Not specified

Authors: Alexandra Kozyreva, Javier Morán-Fraile, Alexander Holas, Vincent A. Bronner, Friedrich K. Röpke, Nikolay Pavlyuk, Alexey Mironov, Dmitry Tsvetkov

Date Published: 1st Apr 2024

Publication Type: Journal

Abstract

Not specified

Authors: A.N. Vantyghem, T.J. Galvin, B. Sebastian, C.P. O’Dea, Y.A. Gordon, M. Boyce, L. Rudnick, K. Polsterer, H. Andernach, M. Dionyssiou, P. Venkataraman, R. Norris, S.A. Baum, X.R. Wang, M. Huynh

Date Published: 1st Apr 2024

Publication Type: Journal

Abstract

Not specified

Authors: Leif Seute, Eric Hartmann, Jan Stühmer, Frauke Gräter

Date Published: 25th Mar 2024

Publication Type: InProceedings

Abstract (Expand)

In traditional studies on language evolution, scholars often emphasize the importance of sound laws and sound correspondences for phylogenetic inference of language family trees. However, to date, computational approaches have typically not taken this potential into account. Most computational studies still rely on lexical cognates as major data source for phylogenetic reconstruction in linguistics, although there do exist a few studies in which authors praise the benefits of comparing words at the level of sound sequences. Building on (a) ten diverse datasets from different language families, and (b) state-of-the-art methods for automated cognate and sound correspondence detection, we test, for the first time, the performance of sound-based versus cognate-based approaches to phylogenetic reconstruction. Our results show that phylogenies reconstructed from lexical cognates are topologically closer, by approximately one third with respect to the generalized quartet distance on average, to the gold standard phylogenies than phylogenies reconstructed from sound correspondences.

Authors: Luise Häuser, Gerhard Jäger, Johann-Mattis List, Taraka Rama, Alexandros Stamatakis

Date Published: 22nd Mar 2024

Publication Type: Proceedings

Abstract

Not specified

Editor:

Date Published: 18th Mar 2024

Publication Type: Master's Thesis

Abstract

Not specified

Authors: Xianghe Ma, Michael Strube, Wei Zhao

Date Published: 17th Mar 2024

Publication Type: InProceedings

Powered by
(v.1.16.0)
Copyright © 2008 - 2024 The University of Manchester and HITS gGmbH